PAYING THE PRICE OF IGNORING THE VALUE
CIWEM Executive Director, Nick Reeves, says governments seem to think that actions on the symptoms of a warming world will win the war on climate change. . . Big mistake.
As the UK Government prepares its promised legislation on
climate change and sets targets for reducing carbon emissions, it
must resist the temptation to subsume policies on the environment
in the fight against global warming. That this could happen
is a real possibility and would be a big mistake. With the world
spooked increasingly by the impact of greenhouse gas emissions and
the terrifying predictions of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change on the future of the planet, our leaders must get
the strategy right first time.
We seem to have lost sight of the fact that climate change is a
symptom of the disease and not the disease itself. There is a real
worry that if we just treat the symptom, the underlying causes will
remain. There is a cancer eating away at the vital parts of the
planet, and it is rooted in mankind's failure to value the
resources that sustain us, while hell-bent on a mad kind of 'me,
me' consumerism. It is, as the Stern Report pointed out, market
failure on a massive scale over many years that haunts us now with
the spectre of a world in free-fall.
It is, sadly, part of what we are and our culture that we can
put a price on almost everything except the things that really
matter. We say frequently that health, happiness and contentment,
and so many other non-material factors, are 'priceless', and yet we
take them for granted, only to be missed when they are not there or
when they are threatened. Then their priceless importance to our
lives comes into sharp focus. It hasn't always been that way, and
neither need it be now.
In the drive for growth and higher gross domestic product we
know that these things are outside a traditional pricing structure
that an economist would understand. And while we have learned to
live with that - since Adam was a lad - we also recognise the
conflicts it imposes: in our struggle for work/life balance and our
concern with well-being, a good quality of life and gross domestic
happiness. These are considerations that attempt to address the
mismatch between what can be priced - what we earn, the things we
own, and the capital materials we use - and what we acknowledge to
be priceless.
What is new to us is the realisation that there is another
category of really big things on which we do not put a price,
things we have raided and abused consistently with no account taken
of their cost. It is only now, when that cost has assumed
proportions to the point at which we breach environmental limits
and endanger our ability to survive, that we have been scared rigid
by the enormity of the debt. The rivers, aquifers and waterways
that provide our water, the air we breathe, the sea that surrounds
us, the trees and plants that affect our climate, the soils for
food - everything we hold in common for the benefit of all living
things. All of these things we take for granted as an unpriced
resource with no thought for their future health or
stewardship. Yet they are all part of the equation of life
which depends on the complex interconnection of things - an
interconnection bent out of shape by climate
change.
And therein lies the problem, the biggest challenge we face, the
culture of individualism that assumes the right of personal choice.
And while the right to choose has made life so much better for so
many people, it has also meant that we have forgotten what tribal
societies know so well. Consequently, we now find it very hard to
accept that our private consumption and 'me, me' values can have a
terrible effect on the health of the planet, and therefore us.
Indeed, it is part of the problem of globalisation that it
encourages the individual to believe that his and her actions do
not matter because they can't change things. We frequently speak of
the global village but haven't relearned what the village knew so
very well - the huge damage that each one of us causes.
But, just as the global problem is the result of the sum
of individual actions, so the global solution will depend on small
changes by billions of individuals. All of those changes will
derive from our learning again that we are all interdependent and
our choices and our actions must reflect that. Once we understand
that we are all in this together we stand a chance. As Marshall
McLuhan once said: 'There are no passengers on spaceship Earth,
we're all crew.'
But, we must be well organised and well led. Local, regional,
national and global institutions - public, voluntary and private -
have to create the conditions in which it is easiest for us to act
and consume in a way that recognises the value of all the planet's
resources, and nurtures and protects them. Accepting our
individual responsibility for the common good doesn't mean that we
don't also recognise the value of corporate action. Indeed, once we
understand the interrelation of all things and the pervasive nature
of the eco-system, the case for common action becomes absolutely
irresistable. Our responsibility as individual citizens is to act
in unison. After all, our misuse, our profligacy and our pollution
is common, as well as individual.
And because it breaches geographical boundaries and the borders
of sovereign nations there is no way we can solve these problems
anytime soon unless the climate-sceptics, the selfish and the
spend, spend, spenders alter their thinking and their
behaviour.
So, although we need new global institutions for collective
action on the drive to value the planet's resources properly, the
means to get the work underway are already in place. We can recover
individual and local responsibility for our use of resources. We
can achieve and extend that by a regulatory and incentivising
regime laid down by government. And we can make that possible by
using the reach of the EU to change the way in which the world's
commerce works.
However, all of this does demand that we look beyond the crisis
caused by climate change and concentrate on its cause. Global
warming has happened because human beings have failed to value what
matters most that sustains us - water, land and air. Only by paying
the price that will sustain our environment can we hope to
survive.
Back