GETTING 'GREEN' WATER GREAT
Chris Shirley-Smith* asks: who will regulate
'alternative' water resources?
Let us consider where we are going with sustainable water in the
UK. I believe that it is high time that local government takes
responsibility for non-potable (non-drinking or 'green') water as
part of its long-term, strategic and regenerational endeavours.
Non-potable water forms a minimum of 30 percent usage of domestic
consumption and regulation of 'green' water at local and community
level is both possible and desirable.
The UKWIR (UK Water Industry Research) report, 'Barriers to
Innovation in the Water Sector', proposed holding a convention of
stakeholders to 'agree the long- term strategic goals for the
sector to which innovation could contribute'. But there was no
mention of sustainability.
Through UKWIR's annual monitoring of sustainability issues over
a period of seven years it can be seen that there are still
significant areas of water companies' activity as yet largely
unsullied by the concept of innovation or sustainability.
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee also
produced its conclusions after the consultation it held on its
report into 'Water Management' (June 2006), stating: 'We reiterate
our disappointment with the Government's response and encourage
them to think again about our main recommendations as their water
management policies evolve.' So, no mention of sustainability from
the Government here either.
One can see that the problems facing the industry and its
regulators are sufficiently daunting for them not to concern
themselves much with 'alternatives'. Who then is to drive change if
the water industry itself is still striving to get a grip on where
to begin in post-IPCC days?
Setting the water industry aside for a moment, let us consider
the rise of 'alternative' water systems. These we might group as
those systems which rely on local input of water, which are by and
large collected and consumed locally, and include rainwater
harvesting (RWH), 'grey' water recycling, groundwater use, green
roof and stormwater recirculation and so on. SUDS (Sustainable
Urban Drainage) is already an accepted key feature which some local
authorities have begun to explore, especially in regard to local
flooding episodes.
To some extent it has become almost fashionable to consider RWH
and its storage as one of the green, sustainable elements to be
included in modern housing or commercial developments, promoted by
BREEAM in its catalogue of building features. Schemes often achieve
approval from local authority planners through the fulfilment of
this set of criteria and the inclusion of RWH may, indeed, tip the
balance in favour of the scheme. But are the long-term implications
of such systems taken into account?
If an RWH system is serving a community of consumers from a
communal collection and distribution network, it may be deemed to
be a private supply and therefore whilst the duty of care may still
lie with the development management agents, the responsibility for
monitoring the non-potable, 'green' water may well reside with the
Environmental Health Department of the local authority whose
planning department agreed its installation in the first place.
Unfortunately, and in all probability, that same planning
department will almost certainly have failed (through a lack of
suitable procedure) to notify the Environmental Health Department
of the deployment of a RWH system. Nor, it can almost be
guaranteed, are the staff of that Environmental Health Department
either aware of their responsibilities or have the current skills,
facilities or finances to be the rightful guardians of public
health in this field. With the numbers of such systems creeping up,
sooner or later there will be an 'incident' with the supply of such
unregulated water and questions will be asked as to where the buck
actually stops. The same situation applies whether it is RWH, grey
water recycling or a non-potable 'green' supply derived from any
other water source such as storm water.
A recent survey (2007) by BD (formerly Building Design), reports
that 'two out of three local authorities are not ready to deliver
the green homes promised by the Government', and that planners have
called for 'stronger guidance from central Government' in order to
be able to achieve this. What clues might we offer to assist the
authorities in their mission to protect the public in at
least the water environment?
The first and most urgent step for the Government is to put in
place regulation to establish a minimum quality standard for green
water use in domestic environments - WWUK has been proselytising
such a 'green water standard' for a number of years, along the
lines of those adopted in Germany, Japan, Australia and the USA,
but with little or begrudging heed from our own government to date
- although perhaps some momentum is now gathering pace on this
issue.
The next and equally important task is for local authorities to
recognise that the inclusion of such 'alternative' green water
systems should comprise part of their strategic regeneration plans
and the structured deployment of local water saving schemes should
form part of that initiative. The use of RWH, water recycling,
groundwater abstraction, storm water, SUDS, green roofs and aquifer
recharge are all techniques which can be used to treat and store
water locally for non-potable use thus saving some 30 percent of
highly treated drinking water. This will mostly apply to new build,
but with ingenuity retrofitting need not be left out.
Since it would appear from BD's survey that often the very
'hands-on' and practical aspects of innovative energy, water and
other utility requirements of green homes are beyond the scope of
many traditional planning officers' remit and experience, the
obvious repository of such technical knowledge should lie with what
were formerly known as 'Borough Engineers'. But, of course, such
officers are now almost an extinct breed. The nearest we have are
the Building Control Officers who, again, have limited
responsibilities.
This, then, is a wake-up call to all local authorities to
reappoint and reassemble a new generation of teams of skilled
engineering staff who are capable of assessing and handling the
'nitty-gritty' of innovative schemes. One of the foremost tasks
this new team of engineers will have to undertake is the strategic
and integrated planning and management of local green water
projects which complement both the local development plan and the
incumbent water company's efforts to reduce leakage, manage demand
and create new resources. There is plenty of room for everyone and
there is no time to waste.
*Chris Shirley-Smith is Director of Water Works UK Ltd.
Back