GM CORN CROP THREATENED BY RESISTANT ROOTWORMS

Rick Callahan reports on the development that is worrying scientists in the US about the long term future for rootworm resistance hybrids







One of the USA's most widely planted crops - a genetically engineered corn plant that makes its own insecticide - may be losing its ability to kill a major pest, and scientists fear that poor farming practices are spurring the rise of insects immune to the hybrid's sophisticated weaponry.

 

When it was introduced, in 2003, the Bt corn seemed to be the answer to farmers' dreams.  It was thought that it would allow growers to bring in bountiful harvests using fewer chemicals because the corn produces a toxin that poisons western corn rootworms.  The hybrid was such a swift success that it and similar varieties now account for 65 per cent of all US corn acres - producing grain that ends up in thousands of commonly consumed foods, such as cereal, sweeteners and cooking oil.

However, in recent years, rootworms have feasted on the roots of Bt corn in parts of four Midwestern states, suggesting that some of the insects are becoming resistant to the crop's pest-fighting powers.  Scientists have suggested that this may be the result of farmers planting Bt corn in the same fields year after year.

Most farmers rotate corn with other crops in a practice long used to curb the spread of pests.  But some farmers have abandoned rotation because they need extra grain for livestock or because they have grain contracts with ethanol producers.  Other farmers have eschewed the practice to cash in on high corn prices.

Michael Gray, a science professor from the University of Illinois, who is tracking Bt corn damage in that state says: 'Right now, quite frankly, it's very profitable to grow corn.'

A scientist recently sounded an alarm throughout the biotech industry when he published findings concluding that rootworms in a handful of Bt cornfields in Iowa had evolved an ability to survive the corn's defences.  Similar crop damage has been seen in parts of Illinois, Minnesota and Nebraska, but researchers are still investigating whether rootworms capable of surviving the Bt toxin were the cause.

Kenneth Ostlie, an entomologist at the University of Minnesota, says the severity of the rootworm damage to Bt fields in Minnesota had eased since the problem surfaced in 2009.  Yet reports of damage have become more widespread and he fears resistance could be spreading undetected because the damage rootworms inflict often isn't always apparent readily.  Without strong winds, wet soil or both, plants can be damaged at the roots but remain upright, concealing the problem.  He says the damage he observed in Minnesota came to light only because storms in 2009 toppled corn plants with damaged roots.

 

Ostlie says: 'The analogy I often use with growers is that we're looking at an iceberg and all we see is the tip of the problem.  And it's a little bit like looking at an iceberg through fog because the only time we know we have a problem is when we get the right weather conditions.'

 

Seed producer, Monsanto, created the Bt strain by splicing a gene from a common soil organism called Bacillus thuringiensis into the plant.  The natural insecticide it makes is considered harmless to humans and livestock.  Scientists always expected rootworms to develop some resistance to the toxin produced by the gene.  But the worrisome signs of possible resistance have emerged sooner than many expected.

 

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently chided Monsanto, declaring in a report released on 22 November 2011 that it wasn't doing enough to monitor suspected resistance among rootworm populations.  The report urged for a tougher approach, including expanding monitoring efforts to a total of seven states, including Colorado, South Dakota and Wisconsin.  The EPA also wanted to ensure farmers in areas of concern begin using insecticides and other methods to combat possible resistance. 

 

Monsanto insists there's no conclusive proof that rootworms have become immune to the crop, but the company says it regards the situation seriously and has been taking steps that are 'directly in line' with federal recommendations.

 

Some scientists fear it could already be too late to prevent the rise of resistance, in large part because of the way some farmers have been planting the crop.  They point to two factors: farmers who have abandoned crop rotation and others who have neglected to plant non-Bt corn within Bt fields or in surrounding fields as a way to create a 'refuge' for non-resistant rootworms in the hope that they will breed with resistant rootworms and dilute their genes.

 

Experts worry that the actions of a few farmers could jeopardise an innovation that has reduced pesticide use significantly and saved growers billions of dollars in lost yields and chemical-control costs.

 

Biotechnology director at the Center for Science and Public Policy, Gregory Jaffe, says: 'This is a public good that should be protected for future generations and not squandered too quickly.'

 

Iowa State University entomologist, Aaron Gassmann, published research in July 2011 concluding that resistance had arisen among rootworms he collected in four Iowa fields.  Those fields had been planted continuously for three to six years with Bt corn - a practice that ensured that any resistant rootworms could lay their eggs in an area that would offer plenty of food for the next generation.

 

For now, the rootworm resistance in Iowa appears isolated, but Gassmann says that could change if farmers don't take action quickly.  The rootworm larvae grow into adult beetles that can fly, meaning resistant beetles could easily spread to new areas. Gassmann concludes: 'I think this provides an important early warning.'

 

Besides rotating crops, farmers can also fight resistance by switching between Bt corn varieties, which produce different toxins, or by planting newer varieties with multiple toxins.  They can also treat damaged fields with insecticides to kill any resistant rootworms, or employ a combination of all those approaches.

 

The EPA requires growers to devote 20 per cent of their fields to non-Bt corn.  After the crop was released in 2003, nine out of ten farmers met that standard.  Now it is only seven or eight says Jaffe.

 

Seed companies are supposed to cut off farmers with a record of violating the planting rules, which are specified in seed purchasing contracts.  To improve compliance, companies are now introducing blends that have conventional seed premixed with Bt seed.

 

Brian Schaumburg, who farms 1,400 acres near the north central Illinois town of Chenoa, plants as much Bt corn as he can every spring.  But he says that he shifts his planting strategy each year, varying which Bt corn hybrids he uses and applying pesticides when required, to reduce the chances of rootworm resistance emerging in his fields.  He says he always plants the required refuge fields and believes very few farmers defy the rule.  He believes those who do, put the valuable crop at risk. 'If we don't do it right, we could lose these good tools,' he says.

If rootworms do become resistant to Bt corn it, 'could become the most economically damaging example of insect resistance to a genetically modified crop in the US,' concludes Bruce Tabashnik, an entomologist at the University of Arizona.  'It's a pest of great economic significance - a billion dollar pest.'

Rick Callahan writes for The Associated Press and OfficialWire

Back